The Taxonomic Conundrums Of The Hoya Genus.

Written By Callum

You might be asking yourself why on earth the Hoya plant you have is now suddenly being called something completely different? Maybe you are asking yourself how you missed that news? Never fear……. so did most of us! Which leads me to my next topic…..
The Ever-Shifting Taxonomy of Hoya: Why It Changes and Why It Matters

Few plant genera inspire as much fascination — and occasional frustration — as Hoya. Known as wax plants for their thick, often fragrant flowers, Hoyas have captured the devotion of collectors, researchers, and hobbyists worldwide. But anyone who has tried to identify their Hoya collection knows that the names and classifications seem to change constantly.

Why is Hoya taxonomy so fluid? And is this ongoing revision truly necessary?

🔄 Why Hoya Taxonomy Keeps Changing

Taxonomy — the science of classifying organisms — is never static. In Hoyas, the constant reshuffling is driven by:

  1. Sheer Diversity
    With over 700 described species (and counting), Hoya is a sprawling genus distributed across South and Southeast Asia, the Pacific, and Australia. New species continue to be discovered, requiring taxonomists to redraw the family tree.

  2. Historical Limitations
    Early classifications relied heavily on visible traits — leaf shape, venation, or flower color. Yet Hoyas are famously plastic: one plant can look dramatically different depending on light, soil, or climate. What was once thought to be multiple species may be variation within one.

  3. Modern Tools
    Advances in DNA sequencing have reshaped taxonomy across the plant kingdom. In Hoyas, genetic evidence often reveals that plants grouped together are not as closely related as assumed, prompting taxonomists to merge, split, or rename species.

Figure 1. Cladogram of the genus Hoya (Apocynaceae: Marsdenieae), showing the 17 currently recognised sections. The diagram illustrates the taxonomic placement of Hoya within the family Apocynaceae and tribe Marsdenieae, with each horizontal branch representing a formally described section (H. sect. Acanthostemma, H. sect. Amblyostemma, H. sect. Angustialatus, H. sect. Angusticarinatae, H. sect. Antiostelma, H. sect. Centrostemma, H. sect. Cystidianthus, H. sect. Eriostemma, H. sect. Hoya, H. sect. Latiretinacula, H. sect. Oreostemma, H. sect. Otostemma, H. sect. Pachystelma, H. sect. Peltostemma, H. sect. Physostemma, H. sect. Plocostemma, and H. sect. Pterostelma). These sections reflect morphological groupings currently accepted in the literature, though boundaries remain subject to revision as molecular phylogenetic analyses provide further resolution of evolutionary relationships within the genus.

🌸 Breaking Down Complexes

Many Hoyas are described in terms of “complexes” — loose groups of plants with overlapping traits. Examples include the Hoya carnosa complex or the Hoya australis complex.

To resolve these complexes, botanists combine:

  • Morphological study: measuring floral structures like corona lobes or pollinia.

  • Field research: observing populations in the wild, noting pollinators and flowering times.

  • Genetic sequencing: confirming evolutionary divergence.

When consistent differences are found, a complex can be split into distinct, valid species.

🍃 What Causes Variation in Hoyas?

  • Environmental Plasticity: Leaves and flowers change form depending on growing conditions.

  • Geographic Isolation: Populations separated by islands or mountain ranges evolve independently.

  • Hybridisation: Both in the wild and in cultivation, hybrids can blur boundaries.

  • Horticultural Selection: Cultivars bred for unusual foliage or flower colour may appear unlike their wild relatives.

❓ Is Constant Change Necessary?

For collectors, the revolving door of names can feel unnecessary. But in science, these changes serve vital purposes:

  • Conservation accuracy: Protecting biodiversity depends on knowing which species truly exist.

  • Evolutionary insight: Taxonomy traces how Hoyas diversified across regions.

  • Shared language: Consistent naming ensures botanists, horticulturists, and hobbyists can communicate clearly.

“Each name change reflects a step forward — a clearer picture of the real diversity within this endlessly fascinating genus.”

🌏 Conclusion

The shifting taxonomy of Hoya is not a flaw but a strength. With every discovery, every genetic analysis, and every reclassification, we get closer to understanding the true breadth of this remarkable genus. For collectors, it may mean relabelling a pot or two — but for science, it means honouring the complexity and wonder of Hoya.

📚 Further Reading (APA 6th)

Rodda, M., & Simonsson Juhonewe, N. (2013). Hoya sections revived, with a new infrageneric classification of the genus. Nordic Journal of Botany, 31(4), 382–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.2012.01704.x

Rodda, M. (2016). Typification of Hoya sections and an updated sectional classification of the genus. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 180(4), 473–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12383

Wanntorp, L., Kocyan, A., & Renner, S. S. (2006). Wax plants disentangled: A phylogeny of Hoya (Apocynaceae) inferred from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 39(3), 722–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.01.004

Kidner, C. A., & Wanntorp, L. (2011). Phylogenetic relationships and morphological evolution in Hoya (Apocynaceae). Annals of Botany, 108(1), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr086

Lamb, A., & Rodda, M. (2016). A guide to Hoyas of Borneo. Kota Kinabalu: Natural History Publications (Borneo).

Callum
Next

Growing Hoya Outside in Cool Climates